Doucet v. Richardson

29 A. 635, 67 N.H. 186
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedJune 5, 1892
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 29 A. 635 (Doucet v. Richardson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Doucet v. Richardson, 29 A. 635, 67 N.H. 186 (N.H. 1892).

Opinion

Clabk, J.

William Doucet bought the horse of Hamel and became its owner in July, 1889, and from that time until the attachment by the defendant in July, 1891, the horse was not out of his possession. The contract between William Doucet, Hamel, and the plaintiff vested the title to the horse in the plaintiff, as between those parties; but there being no change of possession, the horse remaining in the custody and use of William Doucet was liable to attachment by his creditors. It is unnecessary to-cite authorities to the point that a sale of chattels is invalid as to creditors of the vendor when the property is allowed to remain in his use and possession.

Judgment for the defendant.

Smith, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

W. P. Chamberlain Co. v. Tuttle
71 A. 865 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 A. 635, 67 N.H. 186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doucet-v-richardson-nh-1892.