Doucet v. Doucet

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Doucet v. Doucet

620 So. 2d 819, 1993 La. LEXIS 2087, 1993 WL 228362

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJune 23, 1993

DocketNo. 93-CC-1709

StatusPublished

This text of 620 So. 2d 819 (Doucet v. Doucet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Doucet v. Doucet, 620 So. 2d 819, 1993 La. LEXIS 2087, 1993 WL 228362 (La. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Doucet, Lindy Schaffer; — Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 93CW-0965; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “M”, No. 91-270.

Writ denied. The application is moot, based on advice from counsel for respondent that respondent will not call to testify the expert witness whose testimony relator contends will be tainted. If the matter is not resolved, relator may reapply.

MARCUS, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Doucet, Lindy Schaffer; — Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 93CW-0965; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “M”, No. 91-270.

Writ denied. The application is moot, based on advice from counsel for respondent that respondent will not call to testify the expert witness whose testimony relator contends will be tainted. If the matter is not resolved, relator may reapply.

MARCUS, J., not on panel.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

620 So. 2d 819, 1993 La. LEXIS 2087, 1993 WL 228362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doucet-v-doucet-la-1993.