Double MK Farm v. Frelinghuysen Township

12 N.J. Tax 254
CourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
DecidedJune 21, 1991
StatusPublished

This text of 12 N.J. Tax 254 (Double MK Farm v. Frelinghuysen Township) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Double MK Farm v. Frelinghuysen Township, 12 N.J. Tax 254 (N.J. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Tax Court is affirmed essentially for the reasons expressed by Judge Lasser in his reported opinion. 11 N.J.Tax 6. Under certain circumstances, an assessor may reasonably anticipate that access to landlocked property can be obtained through an easement by necessity in determining the value of the property. Contrary to plaintiffs argument, the record discloses that this issue was fairly raised in the course of the trial. We discern no sound basis to disturb the judge’s findings and conclusions pertaining to comparable sales.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Double MK Farm v. Frelinghuysen Township
11 N.J. Tax 6 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 N.J. Tax 254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/double-mk-farm-v-frelinghuysen-township-njsuperctappdiv-1991.