Double Eagle Lubricants, Inc. v. Texas
384 U.S. 434, 86 S. Ct. 1601, 16 L. Ed. 2d 670, 1966 U.S. LEXIS 2950, 1966 Trade Cas. (CCH) 71,787
Opinion
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Swift & Co., Inc. v. Wickham, 382 U. S. 111, and Pennsylvania Public Utility Comm’n v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 382 U. S. 281.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Double Eagle Lubricants, Inc. v. Texas, 384 U.S. 434, 86 S. Ct. 1601, 16 L. Ed. 2d 670, 1966 U.S. LEXIS 2950, 1966 Trade Cas. (CCH) 71,787 (1966).
384 U.S. 434 (Double Eagle Lubricants, Inc. v. Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kellogg Co. v. Mattox
763 F. Supp. 1369 (N.D. Texas, 1991)
Home Savings Ass'n v. Guerra
720 S.W.2d 636 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1986)
STATE OF LA., EX REL. GUSTE v. Fedders Corp.
543 F. Supp. 1022 (M.D. Louisiana, 1982)
Louisiana Ex Rel. Guste v. Fedders Corp.
524 F. Supp. 552 (M.D. Louisiana, 1981)
Riverside National Bank v. Lewis
603 S.W.2d 169 (Texas Supreme Court, 1980)
Simeon Management Corporation v. Federal Trade Commission
579 F.2d 1137 (Ninth Circuit, 1978)
McIntire v. Estate of Forte
463 S.W.2d 491 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1971)
Viola Rogers, Guardian v. Ray Gardner Flying Service, Inc.
435 F.2d 1389 (Fifth Circuit, 1970)
Cohen v. Bredehoeft
290 F. Supp. 1001 (S.D. Texas, 1968)