Double Bend Mfg. Co. v. United States

39 Cust. Ct. 174
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedOctober 16, 1957
DocketC. D. 1922
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 39 Cust. Ct. 174 (Double Bend Mfg. Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Double Bend Mfg. Co. v. United States, 39 Cust. Ct. 174 (cusc 1957).

Opinion

Johnson, Judge:

The protest herein relates to a shipment of various items of merchandise, designated on the entry as “U. S. Army Scrap of American Origin — Returned American Goods” and entered as free of duty under paragraph 1615 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The item described as “magnesium plates” was assessed with duty by the collector at 20 cents per pound and 10 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 375 of said tariff act, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 51802, and that described as “steel plates” at one-eighth of 1 cent per pound under paragraph 304 of said tariff act, as modified. It is claimed, in the original protest, that scrap materials, especially of American origin, returned to the United States, are duty free. In an amendment to the protest, it is claimed that the merchandise is nondutiable, by reason of Public Law 869, 81st Congress, 2d session, 64 Stat. 1093. The stipulation, upon which this case has been submitted, confines the issue to the merchandise described as “magnesium plates” and abandons the protest as to all other items.

The pertinent statutory provisions are as follows:

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938:

Par. 1615 (a) Articles, the growth, produce, or manufacture of the United States, when returned after having been exported, without having been advanced in value or improved in condition by any process of manufacture or other means. [Free.]

Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 51802:

Par. 375. Magnesium alloys, powder, sheets, ribbons, tubing, wire, and all other articles, wares, or manufactures of magnesium, not specially provided for, 20£ per lb. on the metallic magnesium content and 10% ad val.

Public Law 869, 81st Congress, 2d session, 64 Stat. 1093, amending 56 Stat. 171, to read as follows:

Sec. 1. (a) No duties or import taxes shall be levied, collected, or payable under the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, or under section 3425 of the Internal Revenue Code with respect to metal scrap, or relaying and rerolling rails.
[176]*176(b) The word “scrap,” as used in this Act, shall mean all ferrous and nonferrous materials and articles, of which ferrous or nonferrous metal is the component material of chief value, which are second-hand or waste or refuse, or are obsolete, defective or damaged, and which are fit only to be remanufactured.
Sec. 2. The amendment made by this Act shall be effective as to merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the day following the date of the enactment of this Act and before the close of June 30, 1951. It shall also be effective as to merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption before the period specified where the liquidation of the entry or withdrawal covering the merchandise, or the exaction or decision relating to the rate of duty applicable to the merchandise, has not become final by reason of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.

This case has been submitted upon the official papers and a stipulation of fact, to which various documents have been attached as exhibits. From this record, the following facts appear:

On August 8, 1949, the Department of the Army issued Invitation to Bid No. DA (s) 91-503-EUC-3 on the sale of certain salvage or scrap property located in Europe. The general provisions or conditions to which bids were subject included the following:

15. Pukchaseb.’s Scrap Warrantt. With respect to all scrap covered by this contract, the purchaser represents and warrants to the US Government that such property was offered as scrap, purchased by him as scrap and will be sold, shipped and used only as scrap either in its existing condition or after further preparation.
‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡
23. Purchaser’s Use Warranty. With respect to the items of non-ferrous metal scrap, items numbered 11 and 12 on page No. 10 of the Schedule, covered by this contract; the purchaser Represents and Warrants That Said Scrap Will be Shipped to the United States and That Svoh Scrap Will Be Actually Used in the United States Economy.

Among the items listed for sale under the schedule, headed “NonFerrous Scrap,” was item No. 12, described as “Magnesium, ingots, plates and angles” in a quantity of 23,000 pounds, located at Rothen-bach Ordnance Scrap Collecting Point.

Bernard Price, doing business as Double Bend Mfg. Co., the plaintiff herein, submitted a bid and was awarded certain articles, including item. No. 12. In January 1950, he inspected the awarded scrap materials at Rothenbach. These materials included the item described as “magnesium, ingots, plates and angles,” which, according to Mr. Price, consisted of huge magnesium doorways, probably previous airplane hangars, broken doors, and parts, which items were bent, split, broken, and disformed. In his affidavit, attached to the stipulation herein, he states, “* * * I knew that this material is scrap material, had to be re-melted and could not have any other usable purpose in that present form.” He stated, further, that the Army personnel at Rothenbach represented to him that all the scrap materials in that depot were of United States origin which they would [177]*177prepare for overseas shipment in such reduced volume as to have minimum freight charges. The affiant added:

Specifically, the “non-ferrous metal scrap” with U. S. Army nomenclature “Magnesium, Ingots, Plates and Angles” must have been cut, sheared and remelted in forms of local, i. e. German origin, whereby it was physically impossible to deface the German marking in these used forms, because, upon arrival of these magnesium scraps I could convince myself that the U. S. army personnel in Rothenbach, Germany, had done their best to reduce the shipping volume of these huge airplane hangar parts or similar previous use, to a minimum. Although the U. S. Army personnel has given a nomenclature of “ingots, plates and angles”, these magnesium scrap material had only one and only use, namely the re-melting.

It took tlie Army personnel at Rothenbach several weeks to prepare the material for shipment, but, in a letter, dated February 21, 1950, it was stated that tentative plans called for shipment to Hamburg in sufficient time for loading aboard the “Havorn.”

On March 31, 1950, the material was shipped by the Scrap Control Offices to Schenker & Co. of Hamburg, importer’s agent. The Army Shipping Document covers “Iron, oxide (rushed iron ore)” and “Magnesium, ingots plates & angles,” 23,000 pounds. It contains the following:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dulien Steel Products, Inc. v. United States
40 Cust. Ct. 113 (U.S. Customs Court, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 Cust. Ct. 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/double-bend-mfg-co-v-united-states-cusc-1957.