Douberly v. O'Rourke
This text of 201 So. 2d 245 (Douberly v. O'Rourke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff appeals a final judgment for the plaintiff in the amount of $6,000. The sole question presented is whether the trial court committed reversible error when it denied plaintiff’s motion for a new trial upon the ground that the verdict was [246]*246“manifestly inadequate.” The appellant does, not urge any procedural error, nor does he suggest any passion or prejudice inherent in the verdict.
The judgment is affirmed upon authority of Bulmer v. Strawn, Fla.1951, 53 So.2d 315; City of Miami v. Smith, Fla.1964, 165 So.2d 748; Roberts v. Bushore, Fla.App. 1966, 183 So.2d 708.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
201 So. 2d 245, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4584, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/douberly-v-orourke-fladistctapp-1967.