Doty v. State

201 So. 2d 762
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 22, 1967·No. No. 1-452·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the briefs and record filed herein and the' court finding that appellant has failed to demonstrate prejudicial error the judgment appealed is affirmed. See Hamilton v. State of Florida (Fla.App.2d 1966), 186 So.2d 316.

WIGGINTON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and RAWLS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doty v. State, 201 So. 2d 762 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

201 So. 2d 762 (Doty v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Panzavecchia v. State
201 So. 2d 762 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)