Doty v. Eastman Kodak Co.
675 N.E.2d 1226, 89 N.Y.2d 855, 653 N.Y.S.2d 274, 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 4270
This text of 675 N.E.2d 1226 (Doty v. Eastman Kodak Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Doty v. Eastman Kodak Co., 675 N.E.2d 1226, 89 N.Y.2d 855, 653 N.Y.S.2d 274, 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 4270 (N.Y. 1996).
Opinion
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal as against defendant Cam-Ful Industries, Inc., dismissed upon the ground that as to that party, the Appellate Division order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
675 N.E.2d 1226, 89 N.Y.2d 855, 653 N.Y.S.2d 274, 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 4270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doty-v-eastman-kodak-co-ny-1996.