Doty v. Chicago, St. Paul & Kansas City Ry. Co.
This text of 52 N.W. 135 (Doty v. Chicago, St. Paul & Kansas City Ry. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There was not a particle of evidence in the case from which the jury might determine that any agent of the defend[500]*500ant had made any fraudulent representation to plaintiff to induce her to execute the release pleaded in defense. What was said to her by Dr. Millard was merely the expression of his opinion as to the cure of her injury, and there is nothing to suggest the opinion was not given with the utmost good faith. There is nothing in either assignment of .error.
Order affirmed.-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
52 N.W. 135, 49 Minn. 499, 1892 Minn. LEXIS 210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doty-v-chicago-st-paul-kansas-city-ry-co-minn-1892.