Doty v. Auditorium Pier Co.

56 A. 1132, 65 N.J. Eq. 768, 20 Dickinson 768, 1903 N.J. LEXIS 309
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 16, 1903·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons given by 'Vice-Chancellor Eeed, in his opinion filed in the court of chancery. See 56 Atl. Rep. 720.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Di¡xon, Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Voorhees, Vkoom, Green, Gray — 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doty v. Auditorium Pier Co., 56 A. 1132, 65 N.J. Eq. 768, 20 Dickinson 768, 1903 N.J. LEXIS 309 (N.J. 1903).

56 A. 1132 (Doty v. Auditorium Pier Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.