Doty v. Auditorium Pier Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Doty v. Auditorium Pier Co.

56 A. 1132, 65 N.J. Eq. 768, 20 Dickinson 768, 1903 N.J. LEXIS 309

DecidedNovember 16, 1903

StatusPublished

This text of 56 A. 1132 (Doty v. Auditorium Pier Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Doty v. Auditorium Pier Co., 56 A. 1132, 65 N.J. Eq. 768, 20 Dickinson 768, 1903 N.J. LEXIS 309 (N.J. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons given by 'Vice-Chancellor Eeed, in his opinion filed in the court of chancery. See 56 Atl. Rep. 720.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Di¡xon, Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Voorhees, Vkoom, Green, Gray — 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 A. 1132, 65 N.J. Eq. 768, 20 Dickinson 768, 1903 N.J. LEXIS 309, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doty-v-auditorium-pier-co-nj-1903.