Dotson-Bey v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Dotson-Bey v. State

205 S.W.3d 891, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1732, 2006 WL 3372869

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 21, 2006·No. No. WD 66057·Published

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

Lloyd Dotson-Bey appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. The motion court’s findings and conclusions that Dotson-Bey’s appellate counsel was not ineffective are not clearly erroneous. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The motion court’s judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM.

Lloyd Dotson-Bey appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. The motion court’s findings and conclusions that Dotson-Bey’s appellate counsel was not ineffective are not clearly erroneous. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The motion court’s judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Dotson-Bey v. State, 205 S.W.3d 891, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1732, 2006 WL 3372869 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

205 S.W.3d 891 (Dotson-Bey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.