Dotsis v. Manniello

4 A.D.2d 779, 165 N.Y.S.2d 693, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4741

Opinion

In an action to set aside certain deeds, the appeal is from so much of an order as dismissed the second and third causes of action in the second amended complaint for insufficiency. Order modified so as to deny the motion to dismiss said causes of action. As so modified order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to appellant. In our opinion, the third cause of action is sufficient (see Allen V. La Vaud, 213 N. Y. 322; Doheny v. Lacy, 168 N. Y. 213; Parish, v. Juckett, [780] 147 App. Div. 424 ; 2 Abbott’s Forms of Pleading [2d ed.], pp. 1948-1955). As the first and third causes of action are sufficient, the second is also sufficient (see Magonigle Trucking Go. v. Tambini, 302 N. Y. 617; Keller V. Levy, 265 App. Div. 723). Wenzel, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur; Nolan, P. J., and Ughetta, J., concur in result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dotsis v. Manniello, 4 A.D.2d 779, 165 N.Y.S.2d 693, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4741 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).

4 A.D.2d 779 (Dotsis v. Manniello) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Doheny v. . Lacy
61 N.E. 255 (New York Court of Appeals, 1901)
Allen v. . La Vaud
107 N.E. 570 (New York Court of Appeals, 1915)
Parish v. Juckett
147 A.D. 424 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)
Keller v. Levy
265 A.D. 723 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1943)