Dothan Nat. Bank v. Jones

Fifth Circuit

Dothan Nat. Bank v. Jones

255 F. 332, 166 C.C.A. 502, 1918 U.S. App. LEXIS 1220

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 6, 1918·No. No. 3191·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The action of the referee, approved on review by the trial court, in rejecting the claim presented by the appellant against the bankrupt estate of Foy & Williams, was fully sustained by one phase of the evidence adduced. To say the least, it is not clearly made to appear by the record that the finding of fact upon which apparently the rejection of the claim was based was wrong. The record does not show the commission of any error calling for a reversal of the decree appealed from.

That decree is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The action of the referee, approved on review by the trial court, in rejecting the claim presented by the appellant against the bankrupt estate of Foy & Williams, was fully sustained by one phase of the evidence adduced. To say the least, it is not clearly made to appear by the record that the finding of fact upon which apparently the rejection of the claim was based was wrong. The record does not show the commission of any error calling for a reversal of the decree appealed from.

That decree is affirmed.

Dothan Nat. Bank v. Jones, 255 F. 332, 166 C.C.A. 502, 1918 U.S. App. LEXIS 1220 (5th Cir. 1918).

Pincite

255 F. 332 (Dothan Nat. Bank v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.