Dothan Nat. Bank v. Jones

Fifth Circuit

Dothan Nat. Bank v. Jones

255 F. 332, 166 C.C.A. 502, 1918 U.S. App. LEXIS 1220

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedNovember 6, 1918

DocketNo. 3191

StatusPublished

This text of 255 F. 332 (Dothan Nat. Bank v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dothan Nat. Bank v. Jones, 255 F. 332, 166 C.C.A. 502, 1918 U.S. App. LEXIS 1220 (5th Cir. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The action of the referee, approved on review by the trial court, in rejecting the claim presented by the appellant against the bankrupt estate of Foy & Williams, was fully sustained by one phase of the evidence adduced. To say the least, it is not clearly made to appear by the record that the finding of fact upon which apparently the rejection of the claim was based was wrong. The record does not show the commission of any error calling for a reversal of the decree appealed from.

That decree is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The action of the referee, approved on review by the trial court, in rejecting the claim presented by the appellant against the bankrupt estate of Foy & Williams, was fully sustained by one phase of the evidence adduced. To say the least, it is not clearly made to appear by the record that the finding of fact upon which apparently the rejection of the claim was based was wrong. The record does not show the commission of any error calling for a reversal of the decree appealed from.

That decree is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

255 F. 332, 166 C.C.A. 502, 1918 U.S. App. LEXIS 1220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dothan-nat-bank-v-jones-ca5-1918.