Dot Mort Holding Corp. v. Zito

241 A.D. 692

Opinion

Order granting respondent’s motion to cancel Ks pendens and discontinue the action modified by providing that the same is granted upon the payment by respondent of the principal of the lien with five per cent interest from February 15, 1933, and the costs and disbursements in the action, and as thus modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant. In the absence of circumstances warranting a denial of costs, which element is not present here, a plaintiff in an action for the foreclosure of a lien is entitled to costs on the discontinuance of the same at the instance of a junior lienor. (Tuthill v. Morris, 81 N. Y. 94, 99, 100; Harvey v. Mooney, 168 App. Div. 169; Moran v. Pinchot, 176 id. 807; Kadin v. Samuels, 55 Misc. 442; Lewis v. Robinson, 78 App. Div. 579; Pratt v. Ramsdell, 16 How. [693] Pr. 59, 62; Greater New York Charter, §§ 1035, 1038.) Young, Kapper, Hagarty, CarsweE and Davis, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dot Mort Holding Corp. v. Zito, 241 A.D. 692 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

241 A.D. 692 (Dot Mort Holding Corp. v. Zito) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tuthill v. . Morris
81 N.Y. 94 (New York Court of Appeals, 1880)
Lewis v. Robinson
78 A.D. 579 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)
Harvey v. Mooney
168 A.D. 169 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915)
Kadin v. Samuels
55 Misc. 442 (New York Supreme Court, 1907)
Pratt v. Ramsdell
16 How. Pr. 59 (New York Supreme Court, 1857)