Dosztal v. H. G. Kotten Co.
165 A.D. 986
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 15, 1914
StatusPublished
This text of 165 A.D. 986 (Dosztal v. H. G. Kotten Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Dosztal v. H. G. Kotten Co., 165 A.D. 986 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).
Opinion
Ho opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.; Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ., dissented and voted for reversal and dismissal of complaint on the ground that there was no proof of the defendant’s negligence or of the absence of contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff [intestate],
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
165 A.D. 986, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dosztal-v-h-g-kotten-co-nyappdiv-1914.