Doster v. Mims

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Doster v. Mims

444 So. 2d 1153, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11714

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 10, 1984

DocketNo. 83-472

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 444 So. 2d 1153 (Doster v. Mims) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Doster v. Mims, 444 So. 2d 1153, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11714 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Bryon Curtis Doster appeals from the circuit court’s denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. The issue presented is whether a demand for the extradition of Doster was sufficient to support the rendition warrant issued by the Governor of Florida.

The requisition demand from the state of Arizona stated: “it having been represented and satisfactorily shown to me that [Doster] was present in this State at the time of the commission of [the alleged offenses] and thereafter fled from the justice of this state.... ” There is no doubt that this request was sufficient to meet the requirements of law as provided for in section 941.03, Florida Statutes (1981). The argument offered by the public defender’s office in an Anders¹ brief does not convince us otherwise.

AFFIRMED.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and RYDER and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Bryon Curtis Doster appeals from the circuit court’s denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. The issue presented is whether a demand for the extradition of Doster was sufficient to support the rendition warrant issued by the Governor of Florida.

The requisition demand from the state of Arizona stated: “it having been represented and satisfactorily shown to me that [Doster] was present in this State at the time of the commission of [the alleged offenses] and thereafter fled from the justice of this state.... ” There is no doubt that this request was sufficient to meet the requirements of law as provided for in section 941.03, Florida Statutes (1981). The argument offered by the public defender’s office in an Anders¹ brief does not convince us otherwise.

AFFIRMED.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and RYDER and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

444 So. 2d 1153, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11714, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doster-v-mims-fladistctapp-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack