Doster v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance
This text of 310 S.E.2d 907 (Doster v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We granted certiorari to review the interpretation and application of OCGA § 33-34-5(c) (Code Ann. § 56-3404b) by the Court of Appeals in this case. Doster v. Ga. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co., 167 Ga. App. 527 (307 SE2d 34) (1983). Reviewing the written offer to purchase optional coverage mailed by the insurer and [45]*45completed and returned by the insured we find that the documents meet the requirements of OCGA § 33-34-5(c) (Code Ann. § 56-3404b) as defined by this court in Wiard v. Phoenix Ins. Co., 251 Ga. 698 (310 SE2d 221) (1983), and Stafford v. Allstate Ins. Co., 252 Ga. 38 (— SE2d —) (1984).
The trial court concluded that the insured was entitled only to the optional coverage for which he marked acceptance on the documents, $10,000 personal injury protection. We hold this ruling must be affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
310 S.E.2d 907, 252 Ga. 44, 1984 Ga. LEXIS 575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doster-v-georgia-farm-bureau-mutual-insurance-ga-1984.