Doss v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company

District Court, E.D. California·Decided October 6, 2022·No. 1:20-cv-00907·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JUSTIN DOSS, No. 1:20-cv-00907-BAK (SKO)

12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE 14 HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, (Doc. 32) 15 16 Defendant. 17

18 19 On October 3, 2022, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the action with prejudice. 20 (Doc. 32.) In light of the parties’ stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 21 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been 22 dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 Dated: October 5, 2022 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26

27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doss v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company, (E.D. Cal. 2022).

Doss v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company (Doss v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. City of San Jose
111 F.3d 688 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)