Doss v. Custard

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Doss v. Custard

806 So. 2d 574, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 637, 2002 WL 100435

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 28, 2002

DocketNo. 1D01-3870

StatusPublished

This text of 806 So. 2d 574 (Doss v. Custard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Doss v. Custard, 806 So. 2d 574, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 637, 2002 WL 100435 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the appellant’s response to the Court’s order, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Bd. of County Comm’rs v. Grice, 438 So.2d [575]*575392, 394 (Fla.1983); Benton v. Moore, 655 So.2d 1272, 1273 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). This dismissal is without prejudice to appellant’s right to appeal when a final order is rendered in the trial court. Appellant’s pending motions are denied as moot.

MINER, WEBSTER, and BENTON, JJ„ CONCUR. ■

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the appellant’s response to the Court’s order, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Bd. of County Comm’rs v. Grice, 438 So.2d [575]*575392, 394 (Fla.1983); Benton v. Moore, 655 So.2d 1272, 1273 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). This dismissal is without prejudice to appellant’s right to appeal when a final order is rendered in the trial court. Appellant’s pending motions are denied as moot.

MINER, WEBSTER, and BENTON, JJ„ CONCUR. ■

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

806 So. 2d 574, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 637, 2002 WL 100435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doss-v-custard-fladistctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack