Dosiak v. Javino
This text of 77 Misc. 3d 139(A) (Dosiak v. Javino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dosiak v Javino (2022 NY Slip Op 51371(U)) [*1]
| Dosiak v Javino |
| 2022 NY Slip Op 51371(U) [77 Misc 3d 139(A)] |
| Decided on December 22, 2022 |
| Appellate Term, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports. |
Decided on December 22, 2022
PRESENT: : JERRY GARGUILO, P.J., ELIZABETH H. EMERSON, TIMOTHY S. DRISCOLL, JJ
2022-422 S C
against
Dale Robert Javino, Appellant.
Dale Robert Javino, appellant pro se. Victor A. Carr & Associates, for respondent (no brief filed).
Appeal from an order of the District Court of Suffolk County, Sixth District (James F. Matthews, J.), dated April 6, 2022. The order denied respondent's motion to vacate a default final judgment of that court entered March 17, 2022 upon respondent's failure to appear at a scheduled hearing in a commercial nonpayment summary proceeding.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, without costs, and respondent's motion to vacate the default final judgment is granted.
In this commercial nonpayment proceeding, respondent appeals from an order of the District Court dated April 6, 2022, which denied his motion to vacate a default final judgment of that court entered March 17, 2022 upon his failure to appear at a scheduled hearing. The final judgment awarded petitioner possession and the sum of $25,500.
Upon a review of the record, we find that respondent established both elements required to prevail on his motion to vacate the final judgment based on excusable default: an reasonable excuse for his default and a potentially meritorious defense to the proceeding (see CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Eugene Di Lorenzo, Inc. v A.C. Dutton Lbr. Co., 67 NY2d 138, 141 [1986]; Biffer v Alt Floor & Wall Covering, LLC, 65 Misc 3d 151[A], 2019 NY Slip Op 51878[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 9th & 10th Jud Dists 2019]).
Accordingly, the order is reversed and respondent's motion to vacate the default final [*2]judgment is granted.
GARGUILO, P.J., EMERSON and DRISCOLL, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: December 22, 2022
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
77 Misc. 3d 139(A), 2022 NY Slip Op 51371(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dosiak-v-javino-nyappterm-2022.