Doscher v. Zimmerman

96 A.D.3d 939, 946 N.Y.S.2d 498

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, in the nature of mandamus to compel the respondent Hope Schwartz Zimmerman, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, to determine certain motions in an action entitled Doscher v Doscher, pending in the Supreme Court, Nassau County, under index No. 201489/03.

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act, and only where there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought (see Matter of Legal Aid Socy. of Sullivan County v Scheinman, 53 NY2d 12, 16 [1981]). Under the circumstances presented in this proceeding, the petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought (see Matter of D’Agnese v Scher, 306 AD2d 408, 408-409 [2003]). Rivera, J.P., Balkin, Belen and Chambers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doscher v. Zimmerman, 96 A.D.3d 939, 946 N.Y.S.2d 498 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

96 A.D.3d 939 (Doscher v. Zimmerman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Legal Aid Society of Sullivan County, Inc. v. Scheinman
422 N.E.2d 542 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
D'Agnese v. Scher
306 A.D.2d 408 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)