Dos Pansoncitos, Inc., Jim Bullard and John Hedrick v. William T. Sisco, M.D.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 13, 2011
Docket07-11-00108-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Dos Pansoncitos, Inc., Jim Bullard and John Hedrick v. William T. Sisco, M.D. (Dos Pansoncitos, Inc., Jim Bullard and John Hedrick v. William T. Sisco, M.D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dos Pansoncitos, Inc., Jim Bullard and John Hedrick v. William T. Sisco, M.D., (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

NO. 07-11-0108-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

OCTOBER 13, 2011

______________________________

DOS PANSONCITOS, INC., JIM BULLARD AND JOHN HEDRICK, APPELLANTS

V.

WILLIAM T. SISCO, M.D., APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 99TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

NO.2009-548,044; HONORABLE WILLIAM SOWDER, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellee, William T. Sisco, M.D., filed suit against Appellants, Dos Pansoncitos,

Inc., Jim Bullard and John Hendrick alleging numerous causes of action related to a

written contractual agreement for the purchase of a note. Following a bench trial, the

trial court ordered that Dr. Sisco recover $50,000 in damages plus attorney's fees.

Appellants perfected this appeal. Pending before this Court is Appellants' Unopposed Motion to Dismiss in which

they represent that there is no longer an issue in controversy as the parties have settled

and compromised their differences. Appellants request that this appeal be dismissed

with prejudice and that costs be incurred against the party incurring them.

Without passing on the merits of the case, Appellants' motion is granted and the

appeal is dismissed with prejudice. Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). Per the motion, costs

are to be assessed against the party incurring them. Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d). Having

dismissed the appeal at Appellants' request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained

and our mandate will issue forthwith.

Patrick A. Pirtle Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Dos Pansoncitos, Inc., Jim Bullard and John Hedrick v. William T. Sisco, M.D., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dos-pansoncitos-inc-jim-bullard-and-john-hedrick-v-texapp-2011.