Dorvil v. State
Opinion
Appellant, Jean I. Dorvil, appeals the trial court’s order denying his motion for examination and hearing following his commitment to a state mental hospital. We reverse.
The record shows and the state agrees that the appellant was committed to HRS for involuntary hospitalization following a verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity in a non-jury trial. The state also agrees that the appellant was entitled to a hearing and to have experts appointed to examine the appellant relative to his continued involuntary hospitalization. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.218 (1985); Johnson v. Feder, 485 So.2d 409 (Fla.1986).
Accordingly, we reverse the order denying examination and hearing and remand for proceedings consistent with Rule 3.218.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
528 So. 2d 977 (Dorvil v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.