Dorton v. . Tobacco Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Dorton v. . Tobacco Co.

163 S.E. 925, 202 N.C. 849, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 276

DecidedMay 11, 1932

StatusPublished

This text of 163 S.E. 925 (Dorton v. . Tobacco Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dorton v. . Tobacco Co., 163 S.E. 925, 202 N.C. 849, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 276 (N.C. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to set aside judgment by default and inquiry, rendered by the clerk 20 April, 1931, which inquiry was executed at the August Term, 1931, Cabarrus Superior Court. Motion allowed, and plaintiff appeals. A majority of the Court being of opinion that the case is controlled by the decisions in Meece v. Credit Co., 201 N.C. 139, 159 S.E. 17, andSutherland v. McLean, 199 N.C. 345, 154 S.E. 662, the judgment stands

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to set aside judgment by default and inquiry, rendered by the clerk 20 April, 1931, which inquiry was executed at the August Term, 1931, Cabarrus Superior Court. Motion allowed, and plaintiff appeals. A majority of the Court being of opinion that the case is controlled by the decisions in Meece v. Credit Co., 201 N.C. 139, 159 S.E. 17, andSutherland v. McLean, 199 N.C. 345, 154 S.E. 662, the judgment stands

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

163 S.E. 925, 202 N.C. 849, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 276, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dorton-v-tobacco-co-nc-1932.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack