Dortch v. State

647 So. 2d 263, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11393, 1994 WL 664104
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Dortch v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 651 So. 2d 154
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 29, 1994·No. No. 93-2183·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s decision to sentence Appellant as an adult, holding that the court adequately addressed the mandatory criteria set forth in section 39.059(7)(c), Florida Statutes (1991). However, the state properly concedes error in the calculation of Appellant’s sentencing guidelines scoresheet, in particular, in the assessment of points for prior record. The error is not harmless, as the correct total would reduce the maximum permitted range by one cell. Accordingly, the cause is remanded for resentencing with a corrected scoresheet reflecting a total of 205 points for prior record. The trial court may choose to resentence Appellant within the guidelines or impose a departure sentence, providing a valid reason is given for the latter course. See Roberts v. State, 547 So.2d 129 (Fla.1989).

ZEHMER, C.J., and KAHN and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dortch v. State, 647 So. 2d 263, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11393, 1994 WL 664104 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

647 So. 2d 263 (Dortch v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Roberts v. State
547 So. 2d 129 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)