Dorskind v. Hagedorn Communications Corp.

101 A.D.2d 876, 475 N.Y.S.2d 804, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18578

This text of 101 A.D.2d 876 (Dorskind v. Hagedorn Communications Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dorskind v. Hagedorn Communications Corp., 101 A.D.2d 876, 475 N.Y.S.2d 804, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18578 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages, inter alia, for fraud and breach of contract, defendants appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Smith, J.), entered March 27, 1981, as denied their motion (1) to dismiss the first cause of action alleging fraud, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [a], par 7), and (2) to dismiss the entire complaint as against the individual defendants. 11 Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. H The complaint states a cause of action for fraud. Lazer, J. P., Bracken, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 A.D.2d 876, 475 N.Y.S.2d 804, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dorskind-v-hagedorn-communications-corp-nyappdiv-1984.