Dorskind v. Hagedorn Communications Corp.
This text of 101 A.D.2d 876 (Dorskind v. Hagedorn Communications Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages, inter alia, for fraud and breach of contract, defendants appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Smith, J.), entered March 27, 1981, as denied their motion (1) to dismiss the first cause of action alleging fraud, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [a], par 7), and (2) to dismiss the entire complaint as against the individual defendants. 11 Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. H The complaint states a cause of action for fraud. Lazer, J. P., Bracken, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
101 A.D.2d 876, 475 N.Y.S.2d 804, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dorskind-v-hagedorn-communications-corp-nyappdiv-1984.