Dorsey v. Washington Fidelity National Insurance
This text of 177 S.E. 264 (Dorsey v. Washington Fidelity National Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The policy of life and accident insurance sued upon, and attached to the petition, provided that the company would not be liable “for dismemberment, disability or death resulting wholly or in part, directly or indirectly, from . . gunshot wounds.” The petition sought a recovery for the plaintiff’s illness and disability, and alleged that the same was caused by an accidental pistol -' shot “ at the hands of one Corley.” Under the ruling in Muse v. Interstate Life & Accident Co., [150]*15045 Ga. App. 839 (166 S. E. 219), the words “gunshot wounds,” as used in the policy, include a wound resulting from a .pistol-shot. It follows that the petition failed to set out a cause of action, and was properly dismissed on the written motion of the defendant.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
177 S.E. 264, 50 Ga. App. 149, 1934 Ga. App. LEXIS 667, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dorsey-v-washington-fidelity-national-insurance-gactapp-1934.