Dorsey v. UNC-WILMINGTON
This text of 477 S.E.2d 37 (Dorsey v. UNC-WILMINGTON) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Kathleen DORSEY
v.
UNC-WILMINGTON.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Ann Brown, Assistant Attorney General, for UNC-Wilmington.
*38 Alan McSurely, Chapel Hill, for Dorsey.
Prior report: 122 N.CApp. 58, 468 S.E.2d 557.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff (Dorsey) in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 10th day of October 1996."
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
477 S.E.2d 37, 344 N.C. 629, 1996 N.C. LEXIS 547, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dorsey-v-unc-wilmington-nc-1996.