Dorsey v. Telb, L-08-1134 (6-23-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Dorsey v. Telb, L-08-1134 (6-23-2008)

2008 Ohio 3270

CourtOhio Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 23, 2008

DocketNo. L-08-1134.

StatusUnpublished

This text of 2008 Ohio 3270 (Dorsey v. Telb, L-08-1134 (6-23-2008)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dorsey v. Telb, L-08-1134 (6-23-2008), 2008 Ohio 3270 (Ohio Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY {¶ 1} This matter is before the court on respondent's return of writ and motion to dismiss in response to Joseph R. Dorsey Jr.'s petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

{¶ 2} On May 1, 2008, petitioner filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus alleging that he has been unlawfully incarcerated at the Lucas County Corrections *Page 2 Center. Petitioner claims that there was insufficiency of process and service of process in connection with a receiving stolen property charge and breaking and entering charge filed against him in March 2008. (Case Nos. CRA-08-04568-0101/CRA-08-07484-0101).

{¶ 3} Contrary to petitioner's assertions, the record establishes that at his March 31, 2008 arraignment, petitioner, by and through his appointed counsel, waived any defects as to time, place, or manner of service of the indictment. In addition, the record shows that petitioner failed to file the requisite supporting affidavit, as mandated by R.C.2969.25(A). Lastly, relevant case law establishes that the grand jury indictment of petitioner rendered moot any defects alleged to have occurred in the preliminary hearing process. State ex rel. Pena v.Konteh, 6th Dist. No. L-07-1248, 2007-Ohio-3955.

{¶ 4} On consideration whereof, we find that the petitioner has failed to establish that his confinement is unlawful, the respondent has demonstrated the legitimacy of petitioner's incarceration, and therefore, we find respondent's motion to dismiss well-taken and grant same. Accordingly, petitioner's petition is ordered dismissed at petitioner's costs.

PETITION DISMISSED.

*Page 3

{¶ 5} To the Clerk of Court:

{¶ 6} The Sheriff of Lucas County shall immediately serve upon the respondent by personal service a copy of this decision and is further directed to immediately serve upon all other parties a copy of this decision in a manner prescribed by Civ.R. 5(B).

Peter M. Handwork, J., Arlene Singer, J., Thomas J. Osowik, J., concur. *Page 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY {¶ 1} This matter is before the court on respondent's return of writ and motion to dismiss in response to Joseph R. Dorsey Jr.'s petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

{¶ 2} On May 1, 2008, petitioner filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus alleging that he has been unlawfully incarcerated at the Lucas County Corrections *Page 2 Center. Petitioner claims that there was insufficiency of process and service of process in connection with a receiving stolen property charge and breaking and entering charge filed against him in March 2008. (Case Nos. CRA-08-04568-0101/CRA-08-07484-0101).

{¶ 3} Contrary to petitioner's assertions, the record establishes that at his March 31, 2008 arraignment, petitioner, by and through his appointed counsel, waived any defects as to time, place, or manner of service of the indictment. In addition, the record shows that petitioner failed to file the requisite supporting affidavit, as mandated by R.C.2969.25(A). Lastly, relevant case law establishes that the grand jury indictment of petitioner rendered moot any defects alleged to have occurred in the preliminary hearing process. State ex rel. Pena v.Konteh, 6th Dist. No. L-07-1248, 2007-Ohio-3955.

{¶ 4} On consideration whereof, we find that the petitioner has failed to establish that his confinement is unlawful, the respondent has demonstrated the legitimacy of petitioner's incarceration, and therefore, we find respondent's motion to dismiss well-taken and grant same. Accordingly, petitioner's petition is ordered dismissed at petitioner's costs.

PETITION DISMISSED.

*Page 3

{¶ 5} To the Clerk of Court:

{¶ 6} The Sheriff of Lucas County shall immediately serve upon the respondent by personal service a copy of this decision and is further directed to immediately serve upon all other parties a copy of this decision in a manner prescribed by Civ.R. 5(B).

Peter M. Handwork, J., Arlene Singer, J., Thomas J. Osowik, J., concur. *Page 1

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2008 Ohio 3270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dorsey-v-telb-l-08-1134-6-23-2008-ohioctapp-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack