Dorsey v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Dorsey v. State

206 S.E.2d 603, 131 Ga. App. 785, 1974 Ga. App. LEXIS 1553

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 22, 1974·No. 49246·Published

Opinion

Quillian, Judge.

The appellant was tried and convicted of burglary. An appeal was then filed to this court. Held:

1. Appellant’s counsel contends that the defendant’s rights against self incrimination were denied. With this contention we can not agree. The record shows that the defendant was correctly informed of his rights prior to making a confession. Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436 (86 SC 1602, 16 LE2d 694, 10 ALR3d 974); Jackson v. Denno, 378 U. S. 368 (84 SC 1774, 12 LE2d 908).

2. The remaining enumerations of error were either without merit or abandoned.

Judgment affirmed.

Bell, C. J., and Clark, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Quillian, Judge.

The appellant was tried and convicted of burglary. An appeal was then filed to this court. Held:

1. Appellant’s counsel contends that the defendant’s rights against self incrimination were denied. With this contention we can not agree. The record shows that the defendant was correctly informed of his rights prior to making a confession. Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436 (86 SC 1602, 16 LE2d 694, 10 ALR3d 974); Jackson v. Denno, 378 U. S. 368 (84 SC 1774, 12 LE2d 908).

2. The remaining enumerations of error were either without merit or abandoned.

Judgment affirmed.

Bell, C. J., and Clark, J., concur.

Dorsey v. State, 206 S.E.2d 603, 131 Ga. App. 785, 1974 Ga. App. LEXIS 1553 (Ga. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

206 S.E.2d 603 (Dorsey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related