Dorsey v. State

369 S.E.2d 33, 258 Ga. 220, 1988 Ga. LEXIS 188
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 4, 1988
Docket45603
StatusPublished

This text of 369 S.E.2d 33 (Dorsey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dorsey v. State, 369 S.E.2d 33, 258 Ga. 220, 1988 Ga. LEXIS 188 (Ga. 1988).

Opinion

Per curiam.

The defendant appeals from the superior court’s denial of his motion for pretrial bond. After reviewing the record and the briefs of the parties, we conclude that under the facts of this case the superior court did not abuse its discretion in denying bond.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except, Hunt, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
369 S.E.2d 33, 258 Ga. 220, 1988 Ga. LEXIS 188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dorsey-v-state-ga-1988.