Dorsey v. State

652 So. 2d 1271, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3616, 1995 WL 170353
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 12, 1995·No. No. 95-804·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

GERSTEN, Judge.

Appellant, Baron Dorsey, appeals the denial of his rule 3.850 motion seeking post conviction relief. Based upon the trial court’s well reasoned order, and the attached portions of the record which clearly refute the defendant’s claims, we have no reservations in affirming the order on appeal.

We are well aware of the burdensome calendars and incredible caseload that our criminal courts face on a daily basis. However, all too often this court receives boilerplate orders of denial containing no supporting documentation, which obviously necessitates reversal. This practice is a waste of judicial resources at both the appellate and trial court levels. We commend the trial court for intelligent and thoughtful conservation of a court’s most valuable resource ... time.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dorsey v. State, 652 So. 2d 1271, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3616, 1995 WL 170353 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

652 So. 2d 1271 (Dorsey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Abel v. State
696 So. 2d 496 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Arrison v. State
654 So. 2d 198 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Venero v. Balbuena
652 So. 2d 1271 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)