Dorsey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dorsey v. State

652 So. 2d 1271, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3616, 1995 WL 170353

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 12, 1995

DocketNo. 95-804

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 652 So. 2d 1271 (Dorsey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dorsey v. State, 652 So. 2d 1271, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3616, 1995 WL 170353 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

GERSTEN, Judge.

Appellant, Baron Dorsey, appeals the denial of his rule 3.850 motion seeking post conviction relief. Based upon the trial court’s well reasoned order, and the attached portions of the record which clearly refute the defendant’s claims, we have no reservations in affirming the order on appeal.

We are well aware of the burdensome calendars and incredible caseload that our criminal courts face on a daily basis. However, all too often this court receives boilerplate orders of denial containing no supporting documentation, which obviously necessitates reversal. This practice is a waste of judicial resources at both the appellate and trial court levels. We commend the trial court for intelligent and thoughtful conservation of a court’s most valuable resource ... time.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GERSTEN, Judge.

Appellant, Baron Dorsey, appeals the denial of his rule 3.850 motion seeking post conviction relief. Based upon the trial court’s well reasoned order, and the attached portions of the record which clearly refute the defendant’s claims, we have no reservations in affirming the order on appeal.

We are well aware of the burdensome calendars and incredible caseload that our criminal courts face on a daily basis. However, all too often this court receives boilerplate orders of denial containing no supporting documentation, which obviously necessitates reversal. This practice is a waste of judicial resources at both the appellate and trial court levels. We commend the trial court for intelligent and thoughtful conservation of a court’s most valuable resource ... time.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

652 So. 2d 1271, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3616, 1995 WL 170353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dorsey-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack