Dorsey v. Manzella

238 S.W.3d 182, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1186, 2007 WL 2416521
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 28, 2007·No. ED 88876·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Patricia, Jasper, and Mark Manzella appeal from the trial court’s judgment entered against them in this suit on account for attorneys’ fees. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal, as well as each of the trial court’s rulings alleged to be in error. We find no error of law in any of the complained-of rulings. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment. Rule 84.16(b)(5). 1

1

. All pending motions are denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dorsey v. Manzella, 238 S.W.3d 182, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1186, 2007 WL 2416521 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

238 S.W.3d 182 (Dorsey v. Manzella) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

LARABEE GROUP, LLC. v. City of Kansas City
238 S.W.3d 182 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)