Dorsey v. Manzella

238 S.W.3d 182, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1186, 2007 WL 2416521
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedAugust 28, 2007
DocketED 88876
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 238 S.W.3d 182 (Dorsey v. Manzella) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dorsey v. Manzella, 238 S.W.3d 182, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1186, 2007 WL 2416521 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Patricia, Jasper, and Mark Manzella appeal from the trial court’s judgment entered against them in this suit on account for attorneys’ fees. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal, as well as each of the trial court’s rulings alleged to be in error. We find no error of law in any of the complained-of rulings. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment. Rule 84.16(b)(5). 1

1

. All pending motions are denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

LARABEE GROUP, LLC. v. City of Kansas City
238 S.W.3d 182 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
238 S.W.3d 182, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1186, 2007 WL 2416521, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dorsey-v-manzella-moctapp-2007.