Dorsey v. Drug Enforcement Administration

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Dorsey v. Drug Enforcement Administration. Read the opinion of the Court — 85 F. Supp. 3d 211
District Court, District of Columbia·Decided September 12, 2012·No. Civil Action No. 2011-1350·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) ALVIN DORSEY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 11-1350 (EGS) ) DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION, ) ) Defendant. ) _________________________________________ )

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff brought this action under the Freedom of Information Act, see 5 U.S.C. § 552,

and the Privacy Act, see 5 U.S.C. § 552a, against the Drug Enforcement Administration

(“DEA”). Since plaintiff filed his complaint, two events have changed the course of this case

substantially. First, plaintiff has reformulated his FOIA request to such an extent that it barely

resembles the request initially submitted to the DEA. Second, plaintiff has made a payment of

$475.00 toward search fees estimated for the processing of potentially responsive records. In

light of these developments, and on consideration of Defendant’s Notice of Withdrawal of

Argument [Dkt. #28], it is hereby

ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for Summary

Judgment [Dkt. #13] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that, within 45 days of this Order, defendant shall file either a

renewed summary judgment motion, or a proposed schedule for further proceedings.

SO ORDERED.

EMMET G. SULLIVAN September 12, 2012 United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dorsey v. Drug Enforcement Administration, (D.D.C. 2012).

Dorsey v. Drug Enforcement Administration (Dorsey v. Drug Enforcement Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related