Dorsey v. Drug Enforcement Administration
This text of Dorsey v. Drug Enforcement Administration (Dorsey v. Drug Enforcement Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) ALVIN DORSEY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 11-1350 (EGS) ) DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION, ) ) Defendant. ) _________________________________________ )
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff brought this action under the Freedom of Information Act, see 5 U.S.C. § 552,
and the Privacy Act, see 5 U.S.C. § 552a, against the Drug Enforcement Administration
(“DEA”). Since plaintiff filed his complaint, two events have changed the course of this case
substantially. First, plaintiff has reformulated his FOIA request to such an extent that it barely
resembles the request initially submitted to the DEA. Second, plaintiff has made a payment of
$475.00 toward search fees estimated for the processing of potentially responsive records. In
light of these developments, and on consideration of Defendant’s Notice of Withdrawal of
Argument [Dkt. #28], it is hereby
ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for Summary
Judgment [Dkt. #13] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that, within 45 days of this Order, defendant shall file either a
renewed summary judgment motion, or a proposed schedule for further proceedings.
SO ORDERED.
EMMET G. SULLIVAN September 12, 2012 United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Dorsey v. Drug Enforcement Administration, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dorsey-v-drug-enforcement-administration-dcd-2012.