Dorsey v. Dorsey
This text of 108 S.E. 807 (Dorsey v. Dorsey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The judgment of the court of ordinary discharging an administrator is a complete bar to any action either at law or equity, unless the judgment is impeached for fraud. Carter v. Anderson, 4 Ga. 516 (1); Coleman v. Coleman, 113 Ga. 149-151 (38 S. E. 400).
2. “In a suit on an administrator’s bond, where the plaintiff alleges the administrator’s discharge, in order to escape the effect of that judgment on the ground that it was procured by fraud he must further allege the facts upon which the charge of fraud is based.” Knox v. Raynor, 146 Ga. 146 (2) (90 S. E. 853).
3. This case is fully controlled by the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Knox v. Raynor, supra. There was no error in the judgment sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the petition.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
108 S.E. 807, 27 Ga. App. 458, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dorsey-v-dorsey-gactapp-1921.