Dorsey v. Cohen
156 Misc. 792, 282 N.Y.S. 792, 1935 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1483
Opinion
The provisions of section 135 of the Election Law, added by chapter 955 of the Laws of 1935, requiring a statement showing when and where the subscribing witness was last registered, is a substantial amendment. Its efficacy to prevent fraud is not a matter for the court’s consideration. It must be complied with, along with other formal requirements of law. Non-compliance therewith justifies the action which the board of elections has taken. Motion denied. Settle order on one day’s notice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dorsey v. Cohen, 156 Misc. 792, 282 N.Y.S. 792, 1935 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1483 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1935).
156 Misc. 792 (Dorsey v. Cohen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Goldstein v. Fenton
202 Misc. 435 (New York Supreme Court, 1952)
People v. McManus
187 Misc. 609 (New York Court of General Session of the Peace, 1946)
Dorsey v. Cohen
245 A.D. 849 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1935)