Dorsey M. Ryan v. Consolidated Oil & Gas, Inc., a Corporation

368 F.2d 177, 25 Oil & Gas Rep. 271, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 4448
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedNovember 8, 1966
Docket18406
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 368 F.2d 177 (Dorsey M. Ryan v. Consolidated Oil & Gas, Inc., a Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dorsey M. Ryan v. Consolidated Oil & Gas, Inc., a Corporation, 368 F.2d 177, 25 Oil & Gas Rep. 271, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 4448 (8th Cir. 1966).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This was an action by Consolidated Oil & Gas, Inc., plaintiff, against Dorsey M. Ryan, defendant, to recover on account of unjust enrichment based on fraud resulting from plaintiff’s sale of mineral leases to defendant, a geologist. The case was tried to the court without a jury, the Honorable John E. Miller, Chief Judge, presiding. Judgment was entered in the District Court in the sum of $20,171.24, in addition to which defendant was ordered to reassign to the plaintiff 1% overriding royalty interest on the leaseholds in question. Defendant appeals to this court, claiming insufficiency of the evidence and other related errors. Judge Miller’s opinion in the case plus his opin *178 ion on the motion for a new trial were published as Consolidated Oil & Gas, Inc. v. Ryan, W.D.Ark., Fort Smith Div., 1966, 250 F.Supp. 600. We have read that opinion carefully and are in full concurrence therewith. It is a complete refutation of the claim that the evidence was insufficient to support the judgment and of the other related errors claimed by Ryan in this court. We see no good reason for restating or reiterating that which Judge Miller has said so well in his opinion. On the basis thereof, this case is in all things affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Follett v. Follett (In re Follett)
156 B.R. 30 (E.D. Arkansas, 1993)
Nussbaum v. Weeks
214 Cal. App. 3d 1589 (California Court of Appeal, 1989)
Antinoph v. Laverell Reynolds Securities, Inc.
703 F. Supp. 1185 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1989)
Opinion No.
Arkansas Attorney General Reports, 1988
Zimpel v. Trawick
679 F. Supp. 1502 (W.D. Arkansas, 1988)
City of Harrisburg v. Bradford Trust Co.
621 F. Supp. 463 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1985)
United States v. Alexander Stavros
597 F.2d 108 (Seventh Circuit, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
368 F.2d 177, 25 Oil & Gas Rep. 271, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 4448, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dorsey-m-ryan-v-consolidated-oil-gas-inc-a-corporation-ca8-1966.