Dorsey, Ex Parte Charles Ray

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 12, 2007
DocketAP-75,762
StatusPublished

This text of Dorsey, Ex Parte Charles Ray (Dorsey, Ex Parte Charles Ray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dorsey, Ex Parte Charles Ray, (Tex. 2007).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. AP-75,762
EX PARTE CHARLES RAY DORSEY, Applicant


ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 96-08-01088-CR(1) IN THE 284TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM MONTGOMERY COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N



Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of murder and sentenced to forty (40) years' imprisonment. The judgment included an affirmative finding of a deadly weapon. The Ninth Court of Appeals deleted the deadly weapon finding and affirmed the conviction as modified. Dorsey v. State, 117 S.W.3d 332 (Tex. App. - Beaumont 2003, no pet.).

Applicant contends that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed.

Appellate counsel filed an affidavit with the trial court confirming that she did not timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed. The trial court has entered findings of fact and conclusions of law that: (1) Applicant's claim is barred by laches; and (2) this Court should overrule its cases that hold an Applicant may be entitled to relief if appellate counsel failed to timely notify him that his conviction had been affirmed on direct appeal. The trial court recommends that relief be denied. However, the State has not shown that Applicant's claim is barred by laches. Ex parte Carrio, 992 S.W.2d 486 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for discretionary review of the judgment of the Ninth Court of Appeals in Cause No. 09-02-023-CR that affirmed his conviction in Case No. 96-08-01088-CR from the 284th District Court of Montgomery County. Applicant shall file his petition for discretionary review with the Ninth Court of Appeals within 30 days of the date on which this Court's mandate issues.



Delivered: September 12, 2007

Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Carrio
992 S.W.2d 486 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1999)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)
Charles Ray Dorsey v. State
117 S.W.3d 332 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Dorsey, Ex Parte Charles Ray, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dorsey-ex-parte-charles-ray-texcrimapp-2007.