Dorsett v. State

97 S.W.2d 700
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 28, 1936
DocketNo. 18493
StatusPublished

This text of 97 S.W.2d 700 (Dorsett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dorsett v. State, 97 S.W.2d 700 (Tex. 1936).

Opinion

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for theft of a mule, punishment assessed being two years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

The indictment properly charges the offense. The record contains neither statement of facts nor bills o.f exception. In such condition, nothing is presented for review.

Thé judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 S.W.2d 700, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dorsett-v-state-texcrimapp-1936.