Dorrough v. United States Parole Commission

206 F. App'x 246
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 17, 2006·No. No. 06-1946·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jerry Mack Dorrough, formerly a federal prisoner; appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his “Suit in Equity,” which the district court construed as a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dorrough v. U.S. Parole Comm’n, No. 8:06-cv01708-PJM (D.Md. July 24, 2006). We deny Dorrough’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dorrough v. United States Parole Commission, 206 F. App'x 246 (4th Cir. 2006).

206 F. App'x 246 (Dorrough v. United States Parole Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241