Dorrance v. United States

108 Ct. Cl. 29, 1947 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 3, 1947 WL 5095
CourtUnited States Court of Claims
DecidedJanuary 6, 1947
DocketNo. 46807
StatusPublished

This text of 108 Ct. Cl. 29 (Dorrance v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dorrance v. United States, 108 Ct. Cl. 29, 1947 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 3, 1947 WL 5095 (cc 1947).

Opinions

MaddeN, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court: The question in this case is the same as that involved in the case of John Di Benedetto and is controlled by the decision in the latter case this day announced. [Ante, p. 18.] Plaintiff’s petition should be dismissed. It is so ordered.

Jones, Judge; Littleton, Judge; and Whaley, Chief Justice, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
108 Ct. Cl. 29, 1947 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 3, 1947 WL 5095, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dorrance-v-united-states-cc-1947.