Dorr v. Shaw
1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 382
Opinion
But also held where the sufficiency of the fund, to which the junior creditor can not resort, is doubtful; or the prior [383] creditor refuses to run the hazard of obtaining satisfaction of his debt out of that fund, equity will not take from him any part of his security, unless his debt is first paid.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dorr v. Shaw, 1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 382 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1799).
1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 382 (Dorr v. Shaw) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.