Dorothy S. Emerson v. Elliot L. Richardson, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare
This text of 457 F.2d 1318 (Dorothy S. Emerson v. Elliot L. Richardson, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare denied the second application of appellant, Dorothy S. Emerson, for social security disability benefits. Appellant sought review by the district court of the Secretary’s decision and the Secretary moved for summary dismissal. Upon review of the administrative record, the district court determined that administrative res judicata was applicable under the facts of this case.
Upon examination and consideration of the record and briefs, we discern no new and material evidence which might result in a different determination. See Grose v. Cohen, 406 F.2d 823 (4 Cir. 1971), and Leviner v. Richardson, 443 F.2d 1338 (4 Cir. 1971). We do not now consider whether Henderson v. Cele-brezze, 239 F.Supp. 277 (W.D.S.C.1965), also relied on by the district court, was correctly decided. Cf. Cappadora v. Celebrezze, 356 F.2d 1 (2 Cir. 1966).
Accordingly, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
457 F.2d 1318, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10478, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dorothy-s-emerson-v-elliot-l-richardson-secretary-of-health-education-ca4-1972.