Dorothy King v. Virginia Betts - Concurring
This text of Dorothy King v. Virginia Betts - Concurring (Dorothy King v. Virginia Betts - Concurring) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE February 2, 2011 Session
DOROTHY KING ET AL. v. VIRGINIA BETTS ET AL.
Appeal by Permission from the Court of Appeals Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 06-943-I Claudia Bonnyman, Chancellor
No. M2009-00117-SC-R11-CV - Filed on November 18, 2011
J ANICE M. H OLDER, J., concurring
I concur in Parts I, II, III, V, VI, and VII of the majority opinion. I do not concur in Part IV of the opinion addressing whether federal or state procedural rules should apply to a qualified immunity defense because the issue of whether federal or state procedural law applies is not properly before this Court. See Fayne v. Vincent, 301 S.W.3d 162, 171 (Tenn. 2009).
______________________________ JANICE M. HOLDER, JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Dorothy King v. Virginia Betts - Concurring, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dorothy-king-v-virginia-betts-concurring-tenn-2011.