Dorothy King v. Virginia Betts - Concurring

Tennessee Supreme Court·Decided November 18, 2011·No. M2009-00117-SC-R11-CV·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE

February 2, 2011 Session

DOROTHY KING ET AL. v. VIRGINIA BETTS ET AL.

Appeal by Permission from the Court of Appeals Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 06-943-I Claudia Bonnyman, Chancellor

No. M2009-00117-SC-R11-CV - Filed on November 18, 2011

J ANICE M. H OLDER, J., concurring

I concur in Parts I, II, III, V, VI, and VII of the majority opinion. I do not concur in Part IV of the opinion addressing whether federal or state procedural rules should apply to a qualified immunity defense because the issue of whether federal or state procedural law applies is not properly before this Court. See Fayne v. Vincent, 301 S.W.3d 162, 171 (Tenn. 2009).

JANICE M. HOLDER, JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dorothy King v. Virginia Betts - Concurring, (Tenn. 2011).

Dorothy King v. Virginia Betts - Concurring (Dorothy King v. Virginia Betts - Concurring) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fayne v. Vincent
301 S.W.3d 162 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 2009)