Dorothy Jackson Haynes v. State
This text of Dorothy Jackson Haynes v. State (Dorothy Jackson Haynes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 3, 2019
No. 04-18-00810-CR
Dorothy Jackson HAYNES, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2016CR2226 Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding
ORDER Appellant’s pro se brief was originally due to be filed on December 27, 2018. Neither the brief nor a motion for extension of time to file the brief has been filed. Appellant is therefore ORDERED to respond to this court in writing within ten (10) days of the date of this order. The response should state a reasonable explanation for failing to timely file the brief and demonstrate the steps being taken to remedy the deficiency. If appellant fails to file an adequate response within ten (10) days, this appeal will be abated to the trial court for an abandonment hearing. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2).
_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 3rd day of January, 2019.
___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE, Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Dorothy Jackson Haynes v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dorothy-jackson-haynes-v-state-texapp-2019.