Dorothy Allen v. LaSalle Bank

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Dorothy Allen v. LaSalle Bank. Read the opinion of the Court — 629 F.3d 364
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided January 13, 2011·No. 09-1466·Published

Opinion

PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ________

No. 09-1466 ________

DOROTHY RHUE ALLEN, by her Attorney in fact, James Martin, Individually and as a class representative on behalf of others similarly situated, Appellant v.

LASALLE BANK, N.A; CENLAR FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK FSB; FEIN, SUCH, KAHN AND SHEPARD, PC; JOHN DOE SERVICERS 1-100; JOHN DOE LAW FIRMS 1-100 ________

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (D.C. No. 3-08-cv-02240) District Judge: Honorable Anne E. Thompson ________

Argued September 13, 2010

Before: SLOVITER, BARRY, and SMITH Circuit Judges

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

IT IS ORDERED that the slip opinion in the above case, filed January 12, 2011 be amended as follows: Page 3, line 3, “Federal Debt Collection Practices Act” should be deleted and replaced by “Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.”

By the Court,

/s/ Dolores K. Sloviter Circuit Judge

Dated: January 13, 2011

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dorothy Allen v. LaSalle Bank, (3d Cir. 2011).

Dorothy Allen v. LaSalle Bank (Dorothy Allen v. LaSalle Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.