Dorothea Cangelosi v. Lena Jo Barber

Court of Appeals of Texas

Dorothea Cangelosi v. Lena Jo Barber

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 27, 2011·No. 14-10-00938-CV·Published

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 27, 2011.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-10-00938-CV

____________

DOROTHEA CANGELOSI, Appellant

V.

LENA JO BARBER, Appellee

On Appeal from the 400th District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 05-DCV-144145

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is from a judgment signed August 9, 2010. No clerk’s record has been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record.

On December 22, 2010, notification was transmitted to all parties of the court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days, appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

Appellant has not provided this court with proof of payment for the record. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Brown, Boyce, and Jamison.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 27, 2011.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-10-00938-CV

____________

DOROTHEA CANGELOSI, Appellant

V.

LENA JO BARBER, Appellee

On Appeal from the 400th District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 05-DCV-144145

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is from a judgment signed August 9, 2010. No clerk’s record has been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record.

On December 22, 2010, notification was transmitted to all parties of the court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days, appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

Appellant has not provided this court with proof of payment for the record. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Brown, Boyce, and Jamison.

Dorothea Cangelosi v. Lena Jo Barber, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Dorothea Cangelosi v. Lena Jo Barber (Dorothea Cangelosi v. Lena Jo Barber) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.