Dornheim v. Vom Lehn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dornheim v. Vom Lehn

237 A.D. 886

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1933

StatusPublished

This text of 237 A.D. 886 (Dornheim v. Vom Lehn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dornheim v. Vom Lehn, 237 A.D. 886 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion for reargument denied. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. The question to be certified is: Does the complaint state facts sufficient to constitute the causes of action therein set forth? Time for defendant to answer is granted until ten days after the determination in the Court of Appeals if such determination is adverse to defendant. Present ■—Young, Kapper, Hagarty, Tompldns and Davis, JJ. [See ante, p. 838.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for reargument denied. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. The question to be certified is: Does the complaint state facts sufficient to constitute the causes of action therein set forth? Time for defendant to answer is granted until ten days after the determination in the Court of Appeals if such determination is adverse to defendant. Present ■—Young, Kapper, Hagarty, Tompldns and Davis, JJ. [See ante, p. 838.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

237 A.D. 886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dornheim-v-vom-lehn-nyappdiv-1933.