Dornheim v. Vom Lehn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dornheim v. Vom Lehn

237 A.D. 886

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1933·Published

Opinion

Motion for reargument denied. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. The question to be certified is: Does the complaint state facts sufficient to constitute the causes of action therein set forth? Time for defendant to answer is granted until ten days after the determination in the Court of Appeals if such determination is adverse to defendant. Present ■—Young, Kapper, Hagarty, Tompldns and Davis, JJ. [See ante, p. 838.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for reargument denied. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. The question to be certified is: Does the complaint state facts sufficient to constitute the causes of action therein set forth? Time for defendant to answer is granted until ten days after the determination in the Court of Appeals if such determination is adverse to defendant. Present ■—Young, Kapper, Hagarty, Tompldns and Davis, JJ. [See ante, p. 838.]

Dornheim v. Vom Lehn, 237 A.D. 886 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

237 A.D. 886 (Dornheim v. Vom Lehn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.