Dorn v. James Clancy & Son

Appellate Court of Illinois

Dorn v. James Clancy & Son

68 Ill. App. 421, 1896 Ill. App. LEXIS 517

DecidedJanuary 21, 1897

StatusPublished

This text of 68 Ill. App. 421 (Dorn v. James Clancy & Son) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dorn v. James Clancy & Son, 68 Ill. App. 421, 1896 Ill. App. LEXIS 517 (Ill. Ct. App. 1897).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Gary

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This case comes here on an original record, which— upon proceedings here, which it is not necessary to detail— was admitted to be, in part, no record, and upon three' supplemental records, to which there is no allusion in the-abstract. Unless we disregard rules of this court, which we must enforce impartially or not at all, we can not inquire as to the merits of the case. Thompson v. Economy Furniture Company, 64 111. App. 140.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Gary

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This case comes here on an original record, which— upon proceedings here, which it is not necessary to detail— was admitted to be, in part, no record, and upon three' supplemental records, to which there is no allusion in the-abstract. Unless we disregard rules of this court, which we must enforce impartially or not at all, we can not inquire as to the merits of the case. Thompson v. Economy Furniture Company, 64 111. App. 140.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

68 Ill. App. 421, 1896 Ill. App. LEXIS 517, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dorn-v-james-clancy-son-illappct-1897.