Dorman v. Alexander

937 N.E.2d 1033, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1442
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 1, 2010
Docket2010-1824
StatusPublished

This text of 937 N.E.2d 1033 (Dorman v. Alexander) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dorman v. Alexander, 937 N.E.2d 1033, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1442 (Ohio 2010).

Opinion

In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus of Antuan Dorman. Sua sponte, cause dismissed.

Brown, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
937 N.E.2d 1033, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dorman-v-alexander-ohio-2010.